Sometimes the Critics are Just Plain Wrong

book coverA few of us at the library got suckered into reading Adam Ross’s Mr. Peanut based largely on its favorable review in the New York Times. We might have been wise to take in the preponderance of other reviews, which are peppered with the often intentionally ambiguous adjectives “ambitious,” “inspired,” and “unique.”

Indeed, Mr. Peanut is a complex piece of crime writing that incorporates a mind-boggling number of themes, red herrings and alternate endings. Into a story about a marriage gone horribly wrong, it attempts to meaningfully integrate themes such as game theory, the art of M.C. Escher, the tyranny of peanut allergies, our country’s love affair with unsolved crime (á la Dr. Richard Kimble), office romance, troubled marriages, infertility, and body image issues (to name a few).

Since the book’s publication, it has since received an equally mind-boggling number of mixed reviews, from experts and lay persons alike.

Last month the nation celebrated banned books week, and that list of books is certainly characterized by mixed reviews. Can you think of others?  Even though a few of us at the library didn’t like Mr. Peanut, you might. How often are book critics right? Well, that’s for YOU to decide.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.